We provide specialized winterization services to safeguard your pool during the off-season, and when spring arrives, we handle the thorough opening process.

Author: Sidhartha Das

  • Home
  • Author: Sidhartha Das

The User Date Affidavit India: Why the TM-A Filing Decides Your Trademark Infringement Suit Five Years in Advance

There is a moment in every trademark prosecution that no one treats with the seriousness it deserves, and the consequences of that inattention arrive five years later in a witness box. The moment is when the

Read More

Section 31 Trade Marks Act India: Why “We Are Registered” Is Not the Defence Your Client Thinks It Is

Section 31 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 states that in all legal proceedings, the original registration of a trade mark shall be prima facie evidence of the validity thereof. Most brand owners read the words

Read More

Section 124 Trade Marks Act India: The Mandatory Stay Most Trial Courts Are Still Getting Wrong

When the IPAB was abolished by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and rectification jurisdiction returned to the High Courts, half the trademark Bar quietly assumed Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act had died with it.

Read More

Form 27 India After the 2024 Amendment: The Field They Removed and the Criminal Liability They Kept

The 2024 amendments simplified Form 27 and the in-house community exhaled. No more annual filing. No more revenue disclosure. No more value derived field. The new cycle runs once every three financial years. The reason for

Read More

Pre-Grant Opposition India After the 2024 Rules: Why Most Representations Are Dying at the Threshold

Pre-grant opposition practice in India changed structurally on 15 March 2024, and most practitioners filing representations are still drafting as if it did not. The Patents Amendment Rules, 2024 introduced a gatekeeping mechanism under the amended

Read More

Divisional Applications in India After Syngenta: Why Most Are Dead On Arrival and What to Do About It

Divisional applications in India were, for a decade, treated the way United States practitioners treat continuation applications. A strategic tool. A fallback for commercially valuable embodiments that could not be captured in the original claims. A

Read More

Section 8 Patents Act India: Why the Ninety Days Between FER and Grant Quietly Decide Your Patent’s Fate

The Section 8 revocation risk that is quietly sitting in Indian patent portfolios is not a difficult legal problem. It is a docketing problem that becomes a litigation problem, and by the time it surfaces it

Read More

Orient v. Crompton: Why Mosaicing Prior Art No Longer Works as a Design Infringement Defense in India

The design infringement defense India practitioners have relied on for years at the interim stage just stopped working. The template is familiar to anyone who has defended a consumer durables company against a design infringement suit

Read More

Why Philips Lost an SEP It Had Already Won: What the Delhi High Court Division Bench Decision Means for SEP Litigation in India

Philips won at trial. Eight years later, it lost everything. On 18 May 2026, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court allowed RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018 and 18/2018, set aside the 12 July 2018 decree, and held

Read More

Fertin Pharma v. Assistant Controller: When a Patent Refusal Order Is Bad in Law

A patent refusal order in India that lists prior art and asserts obviousness, without mapping claims, without engaging with the applicant’s technical arguments, and without explaining why a person skilled in the art would combine the

Read More

DISCLAIMER

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertising and solicitation of work. By accessing this website of the Firm “Vera Lex”, you agree and acknowledge that: